• Re: Another good AI Doo Wop

    From Roger@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Aug 3 11:24:57 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:34:22 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:04:01 +0000, bbug wrote:

    To me, this is evidence of the fallacy of your maxim, "All that matters
    is what comes out of the speakers."

    No, to me it proves the maxim. Some of these are better than lots of
    other recordings actually made by humans.

    I CARE that it is an artificial product and mark the recording as a
    zero.

    If I didn't tell you that it was an artificial product and just played
    them as an unissued doo wop from the 50s what would you think of them?

    To me, how and where they came from is totally irrelevant.

    ALL THAT MATTERS IS WHAT'S COMING OUT OF THE SPEAKERS

    I wish I had access to using whatever this program is to make recordings
    to order. I could make loads of tens for myself.

    I have to say I lean much more to Bruce's point of view here than
    Bill's. I've heard several of these "AI" products now and like any other records some were good,some average and some bad.

    But in all cases their musical quality over ruled their "artificiality"
    and was the most important consideration.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Aug 3 18:08:36 2024
    On 8/3/2024 5:19 PM, Bruce wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:15:12 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 2:05:17 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Can you name some singers who do not have a quality voice, but yet make
    beautiful vocal performances?

    Billie Holiday
    Louis Armstrong
    Kris Kristofferson
    Tom Waits
    Leonard Cohen

    --
    BR

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris. I'll give you
    Armstrong, although I wouldn't call any of his good vocal performances "beautiful."

    Waits and Cohen have each never made an even decent vocal performance,
    let alone beautiful.
    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Sat Aug 3 21:19:47 2024
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:15:12 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 2:05:17 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Can you name some singers who do not have a quality voice, but yet make
    beautiful vocal performances?

    Billie Holiday
    Louis Armstrong
    Kris Kristofferson
    Tom Waits
    Leonard Cohen

    --
    BR

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris. I'll give you
    Armstrong, although I wouldn't call any of his good vocal performances "beautiful."

    Waits and Cohen have each never made an even decent vocal performance,
    let alone beautiful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to DianeE on Sat Aug 3 22:21:56 2024
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:08:36 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    Nothing "Beautiful" about any of their vocal performances. Very fitting
    to their styles, but not beautiful. Fats Domino is my favorite artist,
    but that has little to do with his singing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Aug 3 19:47:01 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:34:22 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    I wish I had access to using whatever this program is to make recordings
    to order. I could make loads of tens for myself.

    ask Copilot in MS Edge something like:
    how to make {YouTube} music video using AI tools

    sample response if 'YouTube' is mentioned
    (included are two AI music video tutorial links) :

    Creating a YouTube music video using AI tools can be a fun and
    creative process. Here are some steps and tools you can use:

    1. **Generate Music**:
    - Use AI tools like **Suno AI** or **AIVA** to create original
    music based on your input or prompts╣.

    2. **Create Visuals**:
    - **Kaiber AI**: Generate animations or visuals based on your music
    and prompts╣.
    - **VEED.IO**: Use their AI video generator to create dynamic
    visuals. You can type a prompt, and the AI will generate a video for
    you4.

    3. **Edit the Video**:
    - **Davinci Resolve**: A powerful video editing tool where you can
    combine your AI-generated clips, add effects, and finalize your music
    video╣.

    4. **Add Voiceovers or Text**:
    - **VEED.IO**: Use their AI text-to-speech tool to add voiceovers
    or text to your video4.

    5. **Finalize and Upload**:
    - Once your video is edited and ready, upload it to YouTube. Make
    sure to add a catchy title, description, and tags to reach a wider
    audience.

    Here are some detailed tutorials and resources you might find helpful:
    - [How To Make AI MUSIC VIDEO With Free AI Tools](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlYtvC40jZE) by AI Andy╣.
    - [Create a Music Video with AI | Quick Tutorial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B7ZPdhTZvk) by
    PromptJungle│.

    Feel free to ask if you need more specific guidance on any of these
    steps! ????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 4 01:25:12 2024
    I don't care about the video part. Just the sound recording.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Aug 4 06:54:33 2024
    On 8/3/2024 6:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:08:36 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    Nothing "Beautiful" about any of their vocal performances. Very fitting
    to their styles, but not beautiful. Fats Domino is my favorite artist,
    but that has little to do with his singing.
    ----------
    Okay, how about David Ruffin?

    (One of my favorite artists is Muddy Waters, and it has a lot to do with
    his singing or perhaps we should call it "song styling." The other is
    Bo Diddley, who probably could not have sung the national anthem at a
    ball game.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Aug 4 10:46:29 2024
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 01:25:12 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    I don't care about the video part. Just the sound recording.

    so you just need step 1

    1. **Generate Music**:
    - Use AI tools like **Suno AI**
    https://suno-ai.me/#Generator
    or **AIVA**
    https://www.aiva.ai/
    to create original music based on your input or prompts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to DianeE on Sun Aug 4 14:51:43 2024
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 10:54:33 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    On 8/3/2024 6:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:08:36 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    Nothing "Beautiful" about any of their vocal performances. Very
    fitting
    to their styles, but not beautiful. Fats Domino is my favorite
    artist,
    but that has little to do with his singing.
    ----------
    Okay, how about David Ruffin?

    (One of my favorite artists is Muddy Waters, and it has a lot to do with
    his singing or perhaps we should call it "song styling." The other is
    Bo Diddley, who probably could not have sung the national anthem at a
    ball game.)

    Maybe the problem is in defining what "Beautiful" means when used to
    describe a recording.

    If the vague definition I just got from Googling it is used then Bob
    would be right.

    pleasing the senses or mind aesthetically.

    My idea of beautiful is a lot more specific.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Sun Aug 4 16:05:35 2024
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 15:42:21 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:19:47 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris.

    Holiday has a frail voice.

    It's still a quality voice.

    Kristofferson has a tiny vocal range.

    But still a quality voice. There's lots of really good singers without a
    lot of range, or without much power.

    The fact that you see both as having quality voices is a testament to
    their talents as performers.

    The usual condescending and dismissive bullshit from you, as if you are
    more qualified than I am to judge whether or not someone has a quality
    singing voice.

    A great musician can get compelling music out of a homemade cigar-box
    guitar. An inferior musician will leave us bored even playing a
    Stradivarius.

    Artificial Intelligence would not know what to do with the voices of any
    of the people Diane or I mentioned unless it copied them note for note.

    I'm not saying that you can just tell AI to "Make a recording" and let
    it do what it wants. The human being that is telling AI what to do
    becomes the decision maker as to vocal inflections, power, range, etc...Certainly an AI voice will have more vocal range than any human
    being, right?

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters. Same thing
    with creating an AI music piece.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Aug 5 02:51:04 2024
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 19:36:49 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    There's lots of really good singers without a
    lot of range, or without much power.

    If that's your position, then you are making my point. A "good singer"
    and a good voice are two different things.

    I'm not saying that you can just tell AI to "Make a recording" and let
    it do what it wants. The human being that is telling AI what to do
    becomes the decision maker as to vocal inflections, power, range,
    etc...

    Then it's not AI.

    Of course it's AI. AI can only do things because humans told them how to
    do it. It COULD make a recording on its own too, but only after being
    shown by humans what that entails.

    If I ask AI to "write an essay comparing Chuck Berry
    to Elvis Presley as influences on rock & roll," it will spit out an
    essay on that topic with no further prompts needed. It will require no
    human guidance.

    Only because they already been programmed with human guidance
    beforehand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Mon Aug 5 05:37:12 2024
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better - because of the greedy fees that many doctors charge...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Aug 5 08:13:26 2024
    On 8/4/2024 11:42 AM, BobRoman wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:19:47 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris.

    Holiday has a frail voice.
    Kristofferson has a tiny vocal range.
    ---------
    Billie Holiday was also known to have a small vocal range. I wouldn't
    describe her voice as "frail" on her earlier recordings, before drugs
    took their toll on her.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to RWC on Mon Aug 5 08:15:25 2024
    On 8/5/2024 5:37 AM, RWC wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better - because of the greedy fees that many doctors charge...

    ----------------
    So you think that robot-manufacturers are less greedy than doctors? Ha.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to DianeE on Mon Aug 5 08:19:26 2024
    On 8/5/2024 8:13 AM, DianeE wrote:
    On 8/4/2024 11:42 AM, BobRoman wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:19:47 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris.

    Holiday has a frail voice.
    Kristofferson has a tiny vocal range.
    ---------
    Billie Holiday was also known to have a small vocal range.  I wouldn't describe her voice as "frail" on her earlier recordings, before drugs
    took their toll on her.

    ---------
    She also had something that Ronnie Spector and Linda Ronstadt had, and
    which is irresistible to me although I don't know how to describe it. A "catch" in her voice, a note of "yearning" or....fuck, I really *don't*
    know how to describe it, but I know it when I hear it. It's rare.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 5 15:18:54 2024
    On Aug 4, 2024 at 10:42:21 AM CDT, "BobRoman" <BobRoman> wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:19:47 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    Billie Holiday has a quality voice. So does Kris.

    Holiday has a frail voice.

    Not in the 30s or early 40s. Her voice deteriorated later on.

    Kristofferson has a tiny vocal range.
    The fact that you see both as having quality voices is a testament to
    their talents as performers.
    A great musician can get compelling music out of a homemade cigar-box
    guitar. An inferior musician will leave us bored even playing a
    Stradivarius.
    Artificial Intelligence would not know what to do with the voices of any
    of the people Diane or I mentioned unless it copied them note for note

    --
    BR


    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 5 15:17:02 2024
    On Aug 3, 2024 at 5:21:56 PM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:08:36 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    Nothing "Beautiful" about any of their vocal performances. Very fitting
    to their styles, but not beautiful. Fats Domino is my favorite artist,
    but that has little to do with his singing.

    Yes, he had a really good band. :)

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 5 15:24:55 2024
    On Aug 4, 2024 at 11:05:35 AM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:


    Kristofferson has a tiny vocal range.

    But still a quality voice. There's lots of really good singers without a
    lot of range, or without much power.

    I recently saw a really good concert movie of The Highwaymen recently. On
    stage with Johnny Cash, Willie Nelson, and Waylon Jennings, the limitations of Kristofferson's singing abilities were obvious.

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Aug 5 16:39:42 2024
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:38:17 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    But acts of creativity are something else. We may, theoretically, reach
    a point where a jazz musician can improvise on his trumpet and an AI on saxophone can give him a coherent interaction. But it will not be truly creative. In fact it will most likely feel "creepy and weird."

    Being "creative" is irrelevant to how much I like a recording. If one
    person creates it but a second person takes that creation and does it
    better, I'm going with the better version every time.

    In our era "Why Don't You Write Me" was created by the Feathers, but
    done better by the Jacks, who petty much copied it exactly but with
    better quality voices. Same thing with "You Cheated" by the Slades and
    the Shields, and many other songs.

    If you heard some of these things and did not know they were A1 you
    would not be thinking "creepy and weird" at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to DianeE on Mon Aug 5 16:48:31 2024
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:15:25 -0400, DianeE <DianeE@NoSpam.net> wrote:

    On 8/5/2024 5:37 AM, RWC wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better - because of the greedy fees that many doctors charge...

    ----------------
    So you think that robot-manufacturers are less greedy than doctors? Ha.

    There will be more competition, perhaps 'cheap' but reliable imports,
    and the Government should step in if necessary (at least the Democrats
    might) to make robotic medical treatment affordable for every citizen.

    Of course, doctors and their 'unions' will likely fight this all along
    the way. But it will take only one country's successful adoption of
    medical robots to convince governments, with that small country
    perhaps being used as a loss leader by the manufacturers.

    *And there's a shortage of human doctors*, especially in some
    rural areas. Copilot tells us:
    "Yes, there is a shortage of doctors in certain areas of the United
    States. Currently, more than 83 million people live in regions where
    access to a primary care physician is scarce▓. By 2034, the U.S. could
    face an estimated shortage of up to 124,000 physicians across all
    specialties╣. Urgent action is needed to address this critical issue
    and ensure adequate healthcare for everyone╣."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Aug 5 21:09:48 2024
    On 8/5/2024 11:49 AM, BobRoman wrote:
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:18:54 +0000, Mark D. wrote:

    On Aug 4, 2024 at 10:42:21 AM CDT, "BobRoman" wrote:

    Holiday has a frail voice.

    Not in the 30s or early 40s. Her voice deteriorated later on.

    Compared to, say, Bessie Smith, Holiday always had a frail voice.

    But the two were equally great as artists.
    ----------

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3cKifJYLi8

    Not frail!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RWC on Tue Aug 6 02:00:51 2024
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 9:37:12 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better.

    What does the robot do when something unexpected happens?

    For instance, when I was having my prostate removed the doctor saw that
    one kidney was not connected to the bladder correctly, so he fixed that
    while he was in there. Or the patient has a heart attack or something
    during the surgery. Robots will NEVER operate without a person
    controlling them as they do now with robotic surgery.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Tue Aug 6 01:51:01 2024
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:49:24 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:18:54 +0000, Mark D. wrote:

    On Aug 4, 2024 at 10:42:21 AM CDT, "BobRoman" wrote:

    Holiday has a frail voice.

    Not in the 30s or early 40s. Her voice deteriorated later on.

    Compared to, say, Bessie Smith, Holiday always had a frail voice.

    But the two were equally great as artists.

    I don't agree. I think Billie was a far greater artist than Bessie, and
    history seems to bear that out.

    Here are both artist's listings at Acclaimedmusic. Based on critics
    rankings.

    Billie Holiday - Artist Rank: 131 https://acclaimedmusic.net/artist/Billie%20Holiday.htm

    Bessie Smith - Artist Rank: 388 https://acclaimedmusic.net/artist/Bessie%20Smith.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Mark D. on Tue Aug 6 02:12:16 2024
    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:17:02 +0000, Mark D. wrote:

    On Aug 3, 2024 at 5:21:56 PM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 22:08:36 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    ----------
    Chuck Berry. Koko Taylor. Dave Van Ronk. Elmore James.

    Nothing "Beautiful" about any of their vocal performances. Very fitting
    to their styles, but not beautiful. Fats Domino is my favorite artist,
    but that has little to do with his singing.

    Yes, he had a really good band. :)

    And a producer-arranger-co-writer.

    His voice is great for New Orleans R&B, but there are lots of others
    just as good or better for that. His own piano playing is no small part
    of why he's my favorite. The mix of instruments used on his records for
    most of the 50s too. Piano and sax leads rather than guitar in most
    instances too. Also his prolific number of recordings. Smiley Lewis at
    his best is as good as Fats at his best, but he didn't make near as many recordings at his best as Fats did at his best. Little Richard at his
    best was better than fats, but made far fewer recordings at his best.

    Richard did great versions of a few Fats Domino songs. I don't see Fats
    being able to do a great version of a Richard song. Richard's "I'm In
    Love Again" is not as good as Fats' version, but both are tens. And
    Richard's "Every Night About This Time" and "Valley Of Tears" are both
    better than Fats' versions IMO.

    As for Smiley, his I hear You Knocking" is better than Fats version, but
    both are tens. Smiley's "One Night" is better than Fats version, and so
    is his version of "Ain't Gonna Do It." Fats is better on "Blue Monday"
    although Diane does not agree.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Tue Aug 6 16:30:00 2024
    On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 02:00:51 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 9:37:12 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better.

    What does the robot do when something unexpected happens?

    For instance, when I was having my prostate removed the doctor saw that
    one kidney was not connected to the bladder correctly, so he fixed that
    while he was in there. Or the patient has a heart attack or something
    during the surgery. Robots will NEVER operate without a person
    controlling them as they do now with robotic surgery.

    Bob and I know that Robots will eventually be able to cope with these situations.

    The Robot will know everything about the human anatomy and during
    any medical procedure will be alert to any anomalies (such as one
    kidney not connected ...)

    The situation of a patient having a heart attack during surgery will
    also be within the Robot's knowledge base...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RWC on Wed Aug 7 05:56:08 2024
    On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 20:30:00 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 02:00:51 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 9:37:12 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip. >>>>The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better.

    What does the robot do when something unexpected happens?

    For instance, when I was having my prostate removed the doctor saw that
    one kidney was not connected to the bladder correctly, so he fixed that >>while he was in there. Or the patient has a heart attack or something >>during the surgery. Robots will NEVER operate without a person
    controlling them as they do now with robotic surgery.

    Bob and I know that Robots will eventually be able to cope with these situations.

    The Robot will know everything about the human anatomy and during
    any medical procedure will be alert to any anomalies (such as one
    kidney not connected ...)

    What about an anomaly that had not been seen before? He would have no
    idea what to do.

    Suppose the patient stops breathing? Would the robot give the patient
    mouth to mouth resuscitation?

    The situation of a patient having a heart attack during surgery will
    also be within the Robot's knowledge base...

    Will he tell the nurse robot to get him the paddles?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger@21:1/5 to Bruce on Wed Aug 7 11:25:54 2024
    On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 2:00:51 +0000, Bruce wrote:

    On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 9:37:12 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:05:35 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    You wouldn't just tell a robot to remove and appendix and let it rip.
    The surgeon controlling what the robot does is what matters.

    No, Bruce, this is exactly what will happen in future.

    The sooner doctors are replaced by *fully competent* robots/androids,
    the better.

    What does the robot do when something unexpected happens?

    For instance, when I was having my prostate removed the doctor saw that
    one kidney was not connected to the bladder correctly, so he fixed that
    while he was in there. Or the patient has a heart attack or something
    during the surgery. Robots will NEVER operate without a person
    controlling them as they do now with robotic surgery.

    Did not know about your prostate I wish now I'd had mine removed instead
    of the lonnnnnng radiotherapy sessions and the subsequent hormone
    treatment needed

    And you won't be surprised that I agree pretty much with your stance in
    the AI debate here

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 7 14:23:31 2024
    On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:25:54 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    And you won't be surprised that I agree pretty much with your stance in
    the AI debate here

    LOL I'm not surprised either...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 15:41:37 2024
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsgcr9pjobQ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 16:00:51 2024
    Here is the correct link where they all are.

    https://www.youtube.com/@quiffhead

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 15:44:40 2024
    There are a bunch on this page.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4aXlNCNCeU

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bbug@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 17:04:01 2024
    To me, this is evidence of the fallacy of your maxim, "All that matters
    is what comes out of the speakers."

    I CARE that it is an artificial product and mark the recording as a
    zero.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to bbug on Fri Aug 2 17:34:22 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:04:01 +0000, bbug wrote:

    To me, this is evidence of the fallacy of your maxim, "All that matters
    is what comes out of the speakers."

    No, to me it proves the maxim. Some of these are better than lots of
    other recordings actually made by humans.

    I CARE that it is an artificial product and mark the recording as a
    zero.

    If I didn't tell you that it was an artificial product and just played
    them as an unissued doo wop from the 50s what would you think of them?

    To me, how and where they came from is totally irrelevant.

    ALL THAT MATTERS IS WHAT'S COMING OUT OF THE SPEAKERS

    I wish I had access to using whatever this program is to make recordings
    to order. I could make loads of tens for myself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to bbug on Fri Aug 2 16:49:43 2024
    On 8/2/2024 1:04 PM, bbug wrote:
    To me, this is evidence of the fallacy of your maxim, "All that matters
    is what comes out of the speakers."

    I CARE that it is an artificial product and mark the recording as a
    zero.
    --------
    I'm more with you than with Bruce on this. I don't even want to listen
    to these tracks. The whole idea is weird and creepy to me.

    In the book "1984" there was something about all the pop music being artificially generated. Book was written in 1948 so there weren't any computers around, but Orwell came up with some kind of method for faking
    hit songs. I read the book in high school, 60+ years ago. Funny how
    that's the passage that stuck in my mind. I guess it horrified me
    enough to make an indelible impression.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 20:21:57 2024
    Bill, I would think that you realize that there are records that you
    like that were made partially by computers and machines. Like drum
    machines for instance. I think you said that you like Boney M and also
    some Caribbean music like "Hot Hot Hot" by Arrow.

    Since the 1980s lots of records have used drum machines, auto tune, and
    other computer programs to make parts of recordings. Not to mention
    studio tricks on lots of Beatles records and other stuff already in the
    1960s. If you are zeroing all records that have some artificial sounds
    in them you have a lot more to go.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Aug 2 17:41:07 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:41:37 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsgcr9pjobQ

    kinda sounds good, the lead vocal in particular, BUT a high percentage
    of the lyrics are nonsense :-)

    the tool used to create these songs should allow the AI lyrics
    to be manually adjusted (within spatial limits) before going on to
    create the finished product

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Fri Aug 2 18:43:02 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:00:51 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    Here is the correct link where they all are.

    https://www.youtube.com/@quiffhead

    Another benefit of YouTube Premium membership is:

    at top right of page for any video is the option:

    All From <poster> ...

    click on this (e.g. All From quiffhead) and all posts from <poster>
    will be listed immediately below

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RWC on Fri Aug 2 23:16:52 2024
    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:41:07 +0000, RWC wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:41:37 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsgcr9pjobQ

    kinda sounds good, the lead vocal in particular, BUT a high percentage
    of the lyrics are nonsense :-)

    the tool used to create these songs should allow the AI lyrics
    to be manually adjusted (within spatial limits) before going on to
    create the finished product

    lyrics, shmyrics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Sat Aug 3 02:05:17 2024
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 1:42:40 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 20:49:43 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    The whole idea is weird and creepy to me.

    The beauty of a vocal performance is not in the quality of the voice. A beautiful voice can be boring as shit. The beauty of a vocal performance
    is in every creative decision that the singer makes.

    AI might be able to mimic a voice. It might even be able to copy the
    creative decisions of a talented performer. But it cannot (at least not
    yet) actually be creative.

    The creativity still belongs to a human...the person who is programming
    the AI software to make the record. Let's face it. Just because someone
    has a quality voice does not mean that they are any good at making
    creative decisions.

    Can you name some singers who do not have a quality voice, but yet make beautiful vocal performances?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Sat Aug 3 01:51:36 2024
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 1:42:40 +0000, BobRoman wrote:

    On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 20:49:43 +0000, DianeE wrote:

    The whole idea is weird and creepy to me.

    The beauty of a vocal performance is not in the quality of the voice.

    In your opinion. It really depends upon who is listening.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)