On 7/26/24 10:31 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 7/26/2024 4:17 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 7/25/24 10:40 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 7/25/2024 5:22 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 7/24/24 9:51 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 7/24/2024 5:34 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 7/23/24 12:21 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 7/23/2024 4:35 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 7/22/24 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <20240722105905.000055e9@example.com>,
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:34:52 -0700
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Even if the Democrats decide NOT to meekly accept Kamala >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris
as the Presidential candidate and contest the convention, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> she's
going to have to pick a VP. Who do you think she'll pick? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
AOC
Not quite old enough.
Yes, she is!
She turns 35 in October this year, a few weeks before the
election. The
rules only require that she be 35 on assuming office on
January 20,
2025 so she is definitely old enough to be in either spot on the >>>>>>>>>> ticket.
Kamala's running mate will be white. Not just white but
super-duper
radioactively Caucasian. And mega straight, too.
No Pete Bootyjugs on the ticket.
I hope it's an all female ticket; the Republicans will run out >>>>>>>> of pants after shitting their pants so much.
There are reasons you may get your wish. Some good, and some bad. >>>>>>
I can't think of a downside. Do tell.
One bad reason would be to appeal to progressives ...which, even if
not the *actual* reason for picking a woman, would still garner votes. >>>>
And we don't want to appeal to progressives why exactly? Because
we're trying to bring back horse and buggies, or what? We want more
genocide, pollution, tax cuts for the wealthy? It must be something.
I mean "progressive" in quotes, i.e., unrelated to progress.
And you didn't use quotes the first time why, exactly?
By now, especially on r.a.tv, I think they wouldn't have added clarity. Thanks to considerable abuse, 'progressive' has become pejorative.
Not to me. I don't consider myself a "progressive" but I do align
myself with the on a number of things. Even AOC, who I used to hate for sounding stupid a lot, has made huge strides and sounds much more
competent. Grandpa Progressive Bernie sounds the same of course.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)