| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 21 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 28:37:27 |
| Calls: | 139 |
| Files: | 91 |
| Messages: | 42,688 |
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8j3od$2u35i$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Here are some reasons I think that you are stupid.
1) You recognise that AI generated “reviews” of Doctor Who
episodes are useless garbage. But you insist on posting more
of them anyway, like an even dimmer and more obsessive
version of Tim Bruening.
So whay not debate and pick out flaws?
Here's a revolutionary idea...
How about you debate those Doctor Who episodes here yourself
without using the crutch of an LLM algorithm to do it for you.
You claim to be a Doctor Who fan, so surely you can manage to
start some sort of a conversation about the episodes that you've
seen without the need of assistance? Or is that how you go
through life because you can do nothing without guidance?
In article <xn0op4g9tnmlswc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Here's a revolutionary idea...
How about you debate those Doctor Who episodes here yourself
without using the crutch of an LLM algorithm to do it for you.
You claim to be a Doctor Who fan, so surely you can manage to
start some sort of a conversation about the episodes that you've
seen without the need of assistance? Or is that how you go
through life because you can do nothing without guidance?
So a DW fans can you recall every episode you have seen ever?
The Doctor wrote on 3/8/24 11:02 pm:
In article <xn0op4g9tnmlswc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
We can be sure, Gobble-de-gook, that YOU don't!!Here's a revolutionary idea...
How about you debate those Doctor Who episodes here yourself
without using the crutch of an LLM algorithm to do it for you.
You claim to be a Doctor Who fan, so surely you can manage to
start some sort of a conversation about the episodes that you've
seen without the need of assistance? Or is that how you go
through life because you can do nothing without guidance?
So a DW fans can you recall every episode you have seen ever?
--
Daniel
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
--
Let's go Brandon!
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: >>
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
--
Let's go Brandon!
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
still Why trust AI?
Why indeed.
Kestral Gaian wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
We've tried to explain this to him... many times!!!
still Why trust AI?
Why indeed.
Dave posts AI stuff, then accuses it of making errors and being >un-trustworthy, then continues to post more AI stuff.
Confused? Yeah, us too!!!
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: >>>
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
--
Let's go Brandon!
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing is taking
your input and predicting the most likely responses based on its
training data.
still Why trust AI?
Why indeed.
Blueshirt blustered:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
So, does that mean we are going to get Chat-GPT 'reviews' of
every Doctor Who story, followed by Google Gemini 'reviews' of
every Doctor Who story?
Going to? That’s what we have been getting for weeks!
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
So, does that mean we are going to get Chat-GPT 'reviews' of
every Doctor Who story, followed by Google Gemini 'reviews' of
every Doctor Who story?
As there has been over 300 Doctor Who stories aired since 1963
that would mean <gulp> over 600 AI reviews of Doctor Who stories
posted to Usenet by one Dave Yadallee...
Hmmm... I think it's time to amend my Bozo Bin accordingly.
I trust you even less.
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
Kestral Gaian wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
We've tried to explain this to him... many times!!!
still Why trust AI?
Why indeed.
Dave posts AI stuff, then accuses it of making errors and being un-trustworthy, then continues to post more AI stuff.
In article <xn0ooxwfiijv663000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Kestral Gaian wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
We've tried to explain this to him... many times!!!
But it can read a script.
WEll the prrof in the AI "writing".
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!!
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!!
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
--
Daniel
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!!
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no >‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
Blueshirt wrote on 31/7/24 4:19 am:
Kestral Gaian wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
We've tried to explain this to him... many times!!!
still Why trust AI?
Why indeed.
Dave posts AI stuff, then accuses it of making errors and being
un-trustworthy, then continues to post more AI stuff.
Hey, Blueshirt, you could have just left that at "Dave posts".
Enough typed!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 9:35 am:
In article <xn0ooxwfiijv663000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Kestral Gaian wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
Why do either? An AI cannot watch an episode - all it's doing
is taking your input and predicting the most likely responses
based on its training data.
We've tried to explain this to him... many times!!!
But it can read a script.
No, it can read THE WORDS in the script .... but not the 'background' to
the script.
WEll the prrof in the AI "writing".Well, the *PROOF* certainly isn't in YOUR "writing", Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
trust YOU!!
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There
is no ‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no >> ‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!! >>
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
The Last Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 10:17 pm:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Hmm!! Talk about posting "THE BLEEDING OBVIOUS", Mike!!
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
trust YOU!!
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There
is no ‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
--
Daniel
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!!
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no >>> ‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post “AI” >content. You embody its antithesis.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't trust YOU!!
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no
‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post “AI” >> content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>,trust YOU!!
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no
‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post “AI” >>> content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
You are not atheism. We knew that.
I don’t know what “naturally stupidy” is supposed to mean, and
atheism is a
philosophical position usually reached by analysis and rational thought, so >to juxtapose “atheism” and “naturally stupidy”, and then to declare that
you are not atheism, definitely looks like a posting by one who is
positively gifted with oodles of natural stupidity. So thanks for the >affirmation, though we didn’t need it.
Posting any more junk AI content would simply increase the evidence for
your natural stupidity. If you possessed ANY intelligence you would realise >that the posts are utterly worthless - and stop posting them.
But you won’t, will you? Your obstinate natural stupidity won’t let you.
Incidentally, Dave, I’m not an atheist.
I’m someone who knows the difference between faith and science, and that >the Christian Bibles (all of them) are filled with allegories, just-so >fantasies, ancient laws, errors and contradictions, as well as elements of >history, drama and useful ethical guidelines.
There is no absolute proof that there is no God. But there is ample
evidence that what most people think of as God is a fictional construct in >their minds, and if the being depicted in the Christian Bible really is a >god, it’s not one worthy of worship.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say,
“There is no ‘I’ in Dave Yadalleeâ€.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post
“AI†content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
The Doctor wrote on 1/8/24 11:16 pm:
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
<Snip>
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say,
“There is no ‘I’ in Dave Yadalleeâ€.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post
“AI†content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
Ah!! So YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are a ARTIFICIAL stupid, then, are YOU, >Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel
In article <v8g414$26p8f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
I don’t know what “naturally stupidy” is supposed to mean,
and atheism is a
philosophical position usually reached by analysis and
rational thought, so to juxtapose “atheism” and “naturally stupidy”, and then to declare that you are not atheism,
definitely looks like a posting by one who is positively
gifted with oodles of natural stupidity. So thanks for the
affirmation, though we didn’t need it.
Posting any more junk AI content would simply increase the
evidence for your natural stupidity. If you possessed ANY
intelligence you would realise that the posts are utterly
worthless - and stop posting them.
But you won’t, will you? Your obstinate natural stupidity
won’t let you.
Incidentally, Dave, I’m not an atheist.
I’m someone who knows the difference between faith and
science, and that the Christian Bibles (all of them) are
filled with allegories, just-so fantasies, ancient laws,
errors and contradictions, as well as elements of history,
drama and useful ethical guidelines.
There is no absolute proof that there is no God. But there
is ample evidence that what most people think of as God is a
fictional construct in their minds, and if the being
depicted in the Christian Bible really is a god, it’s not
one worthy of worship.
You really are naturally stupid Mike McKeown.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8g414$26p8f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
I don’t know what “naturally stupidy” is supposed to mean,
and atheism is a
philosophical position usually reached by analysis and
rational thought, so to juxtapose “atheism” and “naturally
stupidy”, and then to declare that you are not atheism,
definitely looks like a posting by one who is positively
gifted with oodles of natural stupidity. So thanks for the
affirmation, though we didn’t need it.
Posting any more junk AI content would simply increase the
evidence for your natural stupidity. If you possessed ANY
intelligence you would realise that the posts are utterly
worthless - and stop posting them.
But you won’t, will you? Your obstinate natural stupidity
won’t let you.
Incidentally, Dave, I’m not an atheist.
I’m someone who knows the difference between faith and
science, and that the Christian Bibles (all of them) are
filled with allegories, just-so fantasies, ancient laws,
errors and contradictions, as well as elements of history,
drama and useful ethical guidelines.
There is no absolute proof that there is no God. But there
is ample evidence that what most people think of as God is a
fictional construct in their minds, and if the being
depicted in the Christian Bible really is a god, it’s not
one worthy of worship.
You really are naturally stupid Mike McKeown.
Great counter-argument there Dave.
Keep it up... as with every word you type here you just prove
the opposite of what you think you are proving!
In article <v8g414$26p8f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>,trust YOU!!
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say, “There is no
‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post “AI”
content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
You are not atheism. We knew that.
I don’t know what “naturally stupidy” is supposed to mean, and
atheism is a
philosophical position usually reached by analysis and rational thought, so >> to juxtapose “atheism” and “naturally stupidy”, and then to declare that
you are not atheism, definitely looks like a posting by one who is
positively gifted with oodles of natural stupidity. So thanks for the
affirmation, though we didn’t need it.
Posting any more junk AI content would simply increase the evidence for
your natural stupidity. If you possessed ANY intelligence you would realise >> that the posts are utterly worthless - and stop posting them.
But you won’t, will you? Your obstinate natural stupidity won’t let you. >>
Incidentally, Dave, I’m not an atheist.
I’m someone who knows the difference between faith and science, and that >> the Christian Bibles (all of them) are filled with allegories, just-so
fantasies, ancient laws, errors and contradictions, as well as elements of >> history, drama and useful ethical guidelines.
There is no absolute proof that there is no God. But there is ample
evidence that what most people think of as God is a fictional construct in >> their minds, and if the being depicted in the Christian Bible really is a
god, it’s not one worthy of worship.
You really are naturally stupid Mike McKeown.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8g414$26p8f$1@dont-email.me>,“There is no
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8g180$2673g$1@dont-email.me>,trust YOU!!
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <v8da0o$1j8l2$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 31/7/24 1:47 am:
In article <v8b0os$137o4$4@dont-email.me>, UbiquitousAre YOU now claiming to be 'AI', Gobble-de-gook, cause WE don't
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <v8as8i$1vqm$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Shada: A Lost Classic, Finally Found
You did this already.
With ChatGPT not google Gemini.
still Why trust AI?
There is no AI there. Not even any I. We can truthfully say,
‘I’ in Dave Yadallee”.
Dave is 100% NS.
NS?
Natural Stupidity, Dave. The reason WHY you feel the need to post “AI”
content. You embody its antithesis.
Atheism is Naturally Stupidy, something I am NOT!
You are not atheism. We knew that.
I don’t know what “naturally stupidy” is supposed to mean, and
atheism is a
philosophical position usually reached by analysis and rational thought, so >>> to juxtapose “atheism” and “naturally stupidy”, and then to >declare that
you are not atheism, definitely looks like a posting by one who is
positively gifted with oodles of natural stupidity. So thanks for the
affirmation, though we didn’t need it.
Posting any more junk AI content would simply increase the evidence for
your natural stupidity. If you possessed ANY intelligence you would realise >>> that the posts are utterly worthless - and stop posting them.
But you won’t, will you? Your obstinate natural stupidity won’t let you.
Incidentally, Dave, I’m not an atheist.
I’m someone who knows the difference between faith and science, and that >>> the Christian Bibles (all of them) are filled with allegories, just-so
fantasies, ancient laws, errors and contradictions, as well as elements of >>> history, drama and useful ethical guidelines.
There is no absolute proof that there is no God. But there is ample
evidence that what most people think of as God is a fictional construct in >>> their minds, and if the being depicted in the Christian Bible really is a >>> god, it’s not one worthy of worship.
You really are naturally stupid Mike McKeown.
Care to give some reasoning for this Dave?
Here are some reasons I think that you are stupid.
1) You recognise that AI generated “reviews” of Doctor Who episodes are >useless garbage. But you insist on posting more of them anyway, like an
even dimmer and more obsessive version of Tim Bruening.
2) You believe that the entire Bible (but only the seventeenth century King >James Version) is literally true. This is factually, demonstrably wrong, >because that Bible contradicts itself in hundreds of places.
3) You refuse to acknowledge science and knowledge, insisting that
evolution (a factual process that can be seen in action on a generational >basis every day) is not true.
4) You claim to be a Christian but act in a most unchristian manner, lying >constantly, never apologising for your insulting and often offensive >comments, and never showing Christian caritas towards others.
5) You fawn over Aggie, a bigoted racist who despises you. You approve of
%, the group’s resident pure troll. You respond to Nomen Nescio (look it >up), a troll whose every comment in this group is intended to offend.
6) After all the decades of corrections you have been given, you still >don’t know the difference between “worse” and “worst”.
7) You have no respect or understanding of religious or philosophical >positions that differ from the brainwashed doctrine you have swallowed from >the fringe cult you belong to.
There. A few of the reasons why I believe you to be stupid. All of them are >objectively true, by the way, not merely my opinions. So can you state some >of yours? I bet you can’t, at least not in a way that makes sense.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
In article <v8j3od$2u35i$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Here are some reasons I think that you are stupid.
1) You recognise that AI generated “reviews” of Doctor Who
episodes are useless garbage. But you insist on posting more
of them anyway, like an even dimmer and more obsessive
version of Tim Bruening.
So whay not debate and pick out flaws?