| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 21 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 28:47:14 |
| Calls: | 139 |
| Files: | 91 |
| Messages: | 42,689 |
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0op3gq8mrh233000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly,
not because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that
was the reason to remove episodes! :-)
I rather McCoy than the Timeless Child.
Yes Dave, we know... and you are entitled to that POV.
It doesn't make the McCoy episodes any better in my eyes though!
;-)
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is replaced with
isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe given the BBC's reputation
is to reconstruct the scenes and voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor
Huw Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are
suggesting that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a
substitute actor, to replace the news scenes and re-dub
the voice overs that Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do
for the purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is
replaced with isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe
given the BBC's reputation is to reconstruct the scenes and
voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
XanaNews ! :-)
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:18:40 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,Kenneth Kendall
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is replaced with
isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe given the BBC's reputation >>>is to reconstruct the scenes and voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
Nick
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:18:40 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,Kenneth Kendall
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is replaced with
isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe given the BBC's reputation
is to reconstruct the scenes and voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
Nick
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:18:40 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,Kenneth Kendall
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is replaced with
isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe given the BBC's reputation >>>> is to reconstruct the scenes and voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him reading
the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI speech synth can >recreate his voice and speech patterns quite naturally from that. It's >already been done for people with ALS.
Nick
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
Blueshirt wrote on 6/8/24 10:51 pm:
The True Doctor wrote:Hmmm! Does "1984" spring to mind??
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
In article <xn0op8wac2cu4nh004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
AI Voicing could change it to Clive M !
On 06/08/2024 13:51, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of
him reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any
decent AI speech synth can recreate his voice and speech
patterns quite naturally from that. It's already been done
for people with ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
Huw Edwards wasn't race swapped and Tennant didn't go back in
time to meet him. He was playing a presenter on a 24 hour news
station and anyone can fill that role if it needs to be
re-dubbed due to the original person portraying the news
reader being a self admitted child abuser, even a woman of
mixed Asian and Jamaican decent.
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were?
What future has this world got if all people are presented
with is revisionist views of the past?
It's already being done just as Orwell predicted and far-left
woke perverts like RTD are at the heart of it.
Blueshirt wrote on 6/8/24 10:51 pm:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of
him reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any
decent AI speech synth can recreate his voice and speech
patterns quite naturally from that. It's already been done
for people with ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were?
What future has this world got if all people are presented
with is revisionist views of the past?
Hmmm! Does "1984" spring to mind??
On 06/08/2024 13:51, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
Huw Edwards wasn't race swapped and Tennant didn't go back in time to
meet him. He was playing a presenter on a 24 hour news station and
anyone can fill that role if it needs to be re-dubbed due to the
original person portraying the news reader being a self admitted child >abuser, even a woman of mixed Asian and Jamaican decent.
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
It's already being done just as Orwell predicted and far-left woke
perverts like RTD are at the heart of it.
Since when was Isaac Newton Indian?
Look at how other woke perverts and retards are race swapping other >historical figures including Anne Boleyn and Cleopatra. Look at how
these degenerates rewrite history to depict African slavery as never
having existing and pretend that Algerians/Numidians were west
sub-Saharan Africans despite them originating from the southern Balkans, >Anatolia, and the Levant 40,000 years ago, with many of them being
whiter than I am.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2024 13:51, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of
him reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any
decent AI speech synth can recreate his voice and speech
patterns quite naturally from that. It's already been done
for people with ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
Huw Edwards wasn't race swapped and Tennant didn't go back in
time to meet him. He was playing a presenter on a 24 hour news
station and anyone can fill that role if it needs to be
re-dubbed due to the original person portraying the news
reader being a self admitted child abuser, even a woman of
mixed Asian and Jamaican decent.
Yes, as I said in another post... a cameo in a fictional TV show
is one thing, revising factual news stories, another.
My point was a reply to yours about recreating the hours of news
footage that Huw Edwards read for the BBC. (As in, the quoted
bit!) Using AI to replace him is historical revisionism. Where
would you stop?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were?
What future has this world got if all people are presented
with is revisionist views of the past?
It's already being done just as Orwell predicted and far-left
woke perverts like RTD are at the heart of it.
I don't agree with the desire to change factual history...
On 06/08/2024 14:39, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0op8wac2cu4nh004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 03/08/2024 13:42, nick wrote:
Kenneth Kendall
He's dead so no nasty surprises.
He was alive at the time so plausible.
He was the voice of the BBC Micro so easy enough to recreate
the words without using that nasty AI stuff - as long as you
don't mind him sounding like a BBC Micro.
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of him
reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any decent AI
speech synth can recreate his voice and speech patterns quite
naturally from that. It's already been done for people with
ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were? What
future has this world got if all people are presented with is
revisionist views of the past?
AI Voicing could change it to Clive M !
Was he presenting the news in 2006? Can any woke BBC news reader even be >trusted not to have skeletons hanging in their closet, or even
themselves handing in their closet engaging in extreme practices to
obtain sexual gratification. Does David Carradine come to mind?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Daniel70 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 6/8/24 10:51 pm:
The True Doctor wrote:Hmmm! Does "1984" spring to mind??
There's hundreds or thousands of hours of video footage of
him reading the news unless the BBC has deleted it. Any
decent AI speech synth can recreate his voice and speech
patterns quite naturally from that. It's already been done
for people with ALS.
The news is the news, it was what it was... it represented
events of the time. The event, the TV station covering it and
the presenter reporting it... Past events become history. You
didn't like RTD changing history with Isaac Newton did you?
I don't believe in re-voicing old news clips to suit modern
sensibilities. How long before the actual news itself starts
getting re-edited so past events don't appear as they were?
What future has this world got if all people are presented
with is revisionist views of the past?
It springs to Agamemnon's mind, as all he ever goes on about is
Orwell.
I think "Animal Farm" is his favourite though!
:-)
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily removed from the >iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not because is a strong contender >for the most s*t Tennant episode.
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw Edwards had a >cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting that RTD is re-editing the >footage, using a substitute actor, to replace the news scenes and re-dub
the voice overs that Edwards provided.
--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is replaced with
isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe given the BBC's reputation
is to reconstruct the scenes and voice over using AI.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly, not
because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that was
the reason to remove episodes! :-)
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor Huw
Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are suggesting
that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a substitute actor,
to replace the news scenes and re-dub the voice overs that
Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do for the
purpose as it's such a small role.
In article <v8jhfp$30kfa$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 02/08/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
No, rather it is because disgraced paedophile news anchor
Huw Edwards had a cameo in the episode. Sources are
suggesting that RTD is re-editing the footage, using a
substitute actor, to replace the news scenes and re-dub
the voice overs that Edwards provided.
That sounds easy enough anyway... any newsreader will do
for the purpose as it's such a small role.
How do we know that the BBC newsreader the pervert is
replaced with isn't a pervert too? The only way to be safe
given the BBC's reputation is to reconstruct the scenes and
voice over using AI.
And the choice of newsreader would be?
In article <xn0op3gq8mrh233000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
The 10th Doctor episode “Fear Her” has been temporarily
removed from the iPlayer catalogue of episodes. But oddly,
not because is a strong contender for the most shit Tennant
episode.
If only!
Imagine how the McCoy era on the iPlayer would look if that
was the reason to remove episodes! :-)
I rather McCoy than the Timeless Child.