• Re: OT: French "shit-show" at the Olympics

    From -hh@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Wed Jul 31 21:04:39 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 07:59:17 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    -hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
    An Italian journalist is asking to be granted asylum in Russia after >>>>> French Olympic "shit-show" opening ceremony where they found some
    "reason" (as if they need one) to insult Christians with drag queens >>>>> posed in an insulting parody of the Last Supper.

    It wasn’t the Last Supper.

    It was a take on “Feast of the Gods”, painted by the artist Jan van >>>> Bijlert in the 17th Century:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Festin_des_Dieux>

    Amazing what triggers right-wing snowflakes!

    A review I read by a non-right-wing snowflake said the whole production
    was a little weird. I suppose, after all, it was France.

    Yeah, it sounds weird. I heard that the main god's ball were visible.
    Have not verified that.

    I’ve seen the “see! Im outraged!” Pic. It was one of the other troop members. Doesn’t look intentional, nor that he was aware of his costume
    slip.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 2 02:41:03 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair


    It wasnâ Tt the Last Supper.

    It was a take on â oFeast of the Godsâ , painted by the artist Jan van >Bijlert in the 17th Century:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Festin_des_Dieux>


    Then why was Putin in it with Trump giving him a blowjob?

    Christian Americans have gone insane over this. Mass shootings and domestic assauts in the South have quadrupled since the opening ceremonies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Retirednoguilt@21:1/5 to Cor on Fri Aug 2 09:12:32 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair

    On 8/1/2024 10:41 PM, Cor wrote:

    It wasnƒ Tt the Last Supper.

    It was a take on ƒ oFeast of the Godsƒ , painted by the artist Jan van
    Bijlert in the 17th Century:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Festin_des_Dieux>


    Then why was Putin in it with Trump giving him a blowjob?

    Christian Americans have gone insane over this. Mass shootings and domestic assauts in the South have quadrupled since the opening ceremonies.

    The planet is incinerating, hundreds of thousands are dying each year
    caught up in endless ethnic wars, millions are dying of drought and
    starvation, and some folks spend their precious, limited time alive
    getting their knickers in a snit over a raunchy image?! Gives new
    meaning to a failure to appropriately prioritize.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank <"frank@21:1/5 to Retirednoguilt on Fri Aug 2 11:51:42 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair

    On 8/2/2024 9:12 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 8/1/2024 10:41 PM, Cor wrote:

    It wasnƒ Tt the Last Supper.

    It was a take on ƒ oFeast of the Godsƒ , painted by the artist Jan van >>> Bijlert in the 17th Century:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Festin_des_Dieux>


    Then why was Putin in it with Trump giving him a blowjob?

    Christian Americans have gone insane over this. Mass shootings and domestic >> assauts in the South have quadrupled since the opening ceremonies.

    The planet is incinerating, hundreds of thousands are dying each year
    caught up in endless ethnic wars, millions are dying of drought and starvation, and some folks spend their precious, limited time alive
    getting their knickers in a snit over a raunchy image?! Gives new
    meaning to a failure to appropriately prioritize.

    You will not be worrying about it too long.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chips Loral@21:1/5 to Cor on Fri Aug 2 12:23:37 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair

    Cor wrote:
    was Putin in it with Trump giving him a blowjob?

    Do you need your tongue ripped clean out of your head, coward?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chips Loral@21:1/5 to Retirednoguilt on Fri Aug 2 12:26:18 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    The planet is incinerating,

    No it is not!

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/05/03/breaking-news-the-climate-actually-changes/

    Breaking News: The Climate Actually Changes!
    Larry Bell

    The new convention is to refer to "global warming" (something many have
    told us to worry about) as "climate change" (meaning pretty much the
    same thing since it's supposed to be bad and caused by us anyway). The
    main difference appears to be that climate change is even worse, since
    global warming also causes global cooling along with a seemingly endless variety of other carbon dioxide-induced upheavals that we are
    responsible for.

    So whenever someone asks whether I believe in global warming, (aka
    climate change) the simple answer is YES. In fact, I don't really know
    anyone who doesn't. If so they clearly aren't very old or observant! On
    the other hand, I don't buy into the causes, consequences or remedies
    that alarmists project.

    Cyclical, abrupt and dramatic global and regional temperature
    fluctuations have occurred over millions of years, long before humans
    invented agriculture, industries, internal combustion engines or
    carbon-trading schemes. Many natural factors are known to contribute to
    these changes, although even the most sophisticated climate models and
    theories cannot even begin to predict the timing, scale (either up or
    down) or future impacts -- much less the marginal contributions of
    various human influences.

    And while global warming has been trumpeted as an epic climate change
    crisis with human-produced CO2, a trace atmospheric "greenhouse gas"
    branded as a primary culprit and endangering "pollutant", don't be too
    sure about the veracity of those pitches. Throughout earlier periods of
    Earth's history those levels have been many times higher than today,
    with temperature changes preceding -- not following -- atmospheric CO2
    changes. It doesn't require a degree in a climate science, or rocket
    science either for that matter, to understand these basic facts.

    Fossil records reveal that atmospheric CO2 levels around 600 million
    years ago were about 7,000 parts per million, compared with 379 ppm in
    2005. Then approximately 480 million years ago those levels gradually
    dropped to 4,000 ppm over about 100 million years, while average
    temperatures remained at a steady 72 degrees. They then jumped rapidly
    to 4,500 ppm and guess what! Temperatures dove to an estimated average
    similar to today, even though the CO2 level was around twelve times
    higher than now. Yes, as CO2 went up, temperatures plummeted.

    About 438 million years ago, atmospheric CO2 dropped from 4,500 ppm to
    3,000 ppm, yet according to fossil records, world temperatures shot
    rapidly back up to an average 72 degrees. So regardless of whether CO2
    levels were 7,000 ppm or 3,000 ppm, temperatures rose and fell
    independently.

    Over those past 600 million years there have been only three periods,
    including now, when Earth's average temperature has been as low as 54
    degrees. One occurred about 315 million years ago, during a 45-million-year-long cool spell called the Late Carboniferous period,
    which established the beginning of most of our planet's (gasp)
    coalfields. Both CO2 and temperatures shot back up at the end of it just
    when the main Mesozoic dinosaur era was commencing. CO2 levels rose to
    between 1,200 ppm and 1,800 ppm, and temperatures again returned to the
    average 72 degrees that Earth seemed to prefer.

    Around 180 million years ago, CO2 rocketed up from about 1,200 ppm to
    2,500 ppm. And would you believe it? This coincided again with another
    big temperature dive from 72 degrees to about 61 degrees. Then at the
    border between the Jurassic period when T. Rex ruled and the Cretaceous
    period that followed, CO2 levels dropped again, while temperatures
    soared back to 72 degrees and remained at that level (about 20 degrees
    higher than now) until long after prodigious populations of dinosaurs
    became extinct. And flatulent as those creatures may possibly have been,
    at least there is no evidence that they burned coal or drove SUVs.

    Based upon a variety of proxy indicators, such as ice core and ocean
    sediment samples, our planet has endured large climate swings on a
    number of occasions over the past 1.5 million years due to a number of
    natural causes. Included are seasonal warming and cooling effects of
    plant growth cycles, greenhouse gases and aerosols emitted from volcanic eruptions, Earth orbit and solar changes, and other contributors with
    combined influences. Yet atmospheric CO2 levels have remained relatively
    low over the past 650,000 years, even during the six previous
    interglacial periods when global temperatures were as much as 9 degrees
    warmer than temperatures we currently enjoy.

    Over the past 400,000 years, much of the Northern Hemisphere has been
    covered by ice up to miles thick at regular intervals lasting about
    100,000 years each. Much shorter interglacial cycles like our current
    one lasting 12,000 to 18,000 years have offered reprieves from bitter
    cold. Yes, from this perspective current temperatures are abnormally
    warm. By about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago Earth had warmed enough to
    halt the advance of glaciers and cause sea levels to rise, and the
    average temperature has gradually increased on a fairly constant basis
    ever since, with brief intermissions.


    During a period from about 750 BC to 200 BC, before the founding of
    Rome, temperatures dropped and European glaciers advanced. Then the
    climate warmed again, and by 150 BC grapes and olives were first
    recorded to be cultivated in northern Italy. As recently as 1,000 years
    ago (during the "Medieval Warm Period"), Icelandic Vikings were raising
    cattle, sheep and goats in grasslands on Greenland's southwestern coast.
    Then, around 1200, temperatures began to drop, and Norse settlements
    were abandoned by about 1350. Atlantic pack ice began to grow around
    1250, and shortened growing seasons and unreliable weather patterns,
    including torrential rains in Northern Europe led to the "Great Famine"
    of 1315-1317.


    Temperatures dropped dramatically in the middle of the 16th century, and although there were notable year year-to-year fluctuations, the coldest
    regime since the last Ice Age (a period termed the "Little Ice Age")
    dominated the next hundred and fifty years or more. Food shortages
    killed millions in Europe between 1690 and 1700, followed by more
    famines in 1725 and 1816. The end of this time witnessed brutal winter temperatures suffered by Washington's troops at Valley Forge in 1777,
    and Napoleon's bitterly cold retreat from Russia in 1812.

    Although temperatures have been generally mild over the past 500 years,
    we should remember that significant fluctuations are normal. The past
    century has witnessed two distinct periods of warming. The first
    occurred between 1900 and 1945, and the second, following a slight
    cool-down began quite abruptly in 1975. That second period rose at quite
    a constant rate until 1998, and then stopped and began falling again
    after reaching a high of 1.16 degrees above the average global mean.

    About half of all estimated warming since 1900 occurred before the
    mid-1940s despite continuously rising CO2 levels. Even U.K. East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) Director Phil Jones has admitted
    that there has been no statistically significant warming for at least a
    decade. He has also admitted that temperatures during the Middle Ages
    may have been higher than today.


    So perhaps you'll wish to ponder this question; Given that over most of
    the Earth's known climate history, the atmospheric CO2 levels have been
    between four and eighteen times higher than now - throughout many times
    when life not only survived but also flourished; times that preceded
    humans; times when CO2 levels and temperatures moved in different
    directions - how much difference will putting caps on emissions
    accomplish? Consider also that about 97% of all current atmospheric CO2
    derives from natural sources.


    And yes, change is the true nature of climate. After all, if climate
    didn't change, we really wouldn't need a word for it would we? Wouldn't
    it all just be "weather"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)